According to an obscure indicator, the U.S. stock market’s direction on the first trading day of January is a reliable indicator of the market’s direction for the full year.
Not so fast. Consider what happened in 2018: the Dow Jones Industrial Average
rose on the first trading day of that year, and yet from then until the end of the year it fell 6.0%. Nor does a loss on the first trading day guarantee a bad year for stocks. In 2016, the Dow fell 1.6% on the first trading day of January and yet, from then until the end of that year, it gained 15.2%.
These are just two examples. But a full analysis of the historical data shows that the statistical support for this indicator is quite modest — at best. Consider all years since the Dow was created in 1896 in which the market rose on the first trading day. The market proceeded to rise 73% of the time from then until the end of the year. That’s just slightly higher than the 64% probability that applies to all years since 1896. Moreover, this increase to 73% from 64% is only marginally significant at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine.
Then there’s the “First Five Days of January” indicator, according to which the market’s direction over the first five trading days foretells the market’s direction from then until the end of the year. The statistical case for this indicator is also weak. In all years since 1896 in which the Dow rose over its first five trading sessions, the market proceeded to rise 69% of the time from then until the end of the year. That’s just three percentage points higher than the 66% probability that applies to all years since 1896. Moreover, this increase is not significant at the 95% confidence level that statisticians typically use when determining if a pattern is genuine.
These results are precisely what you should expect given the U.S. market’s much-vaunted efficiency. If a strong market on the first day of January markedly changed the odds of stocks rising over the subsequent year, then investors would already have taken those odds into account before that first trading day had come to an end. The result would be that those odds would quickly disappear — even if they did exist at some prior point in the past.
The same applies to the “First Five Days of January” indicator. This situation is remarkably analogous to a coin flip. Your coin doesn’t “remember” how many heads or tails it has flipped before. Yet that’s not how most of us think: if you’ve flipped five heads in a row, you’re likely to think that there are increased odds that the sixth will come up tails. In truth, one outcome is no more likely than another.
Statisticians refer to this error as the “gamblers fallacy.” Don’t make the same mistake with your investments.
Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org